For around half a century state officials working in undemocratic secret legal assizes in the UK have abused children by forcibly taking them from their families.

Since the dawn of free social press , campaigners and parents increasingly refuse to be blackmailed into silence about the systematic state abuse and post their shocking stories online.

They face recriminations from court staff who typically suffer psychological disorders and lack of empathy, and so will target the complainants children in response.

F4J already defy constant legal threats from the corrupt ‘family lawyers’ they expose.

They now plan to take on the mantle of naming and shaming both child abusing official stooges, and parents who connive in the abuse of their own children by using the ‘courts’ to stop them seeing the other parent.

Group founder Matt O’Connor explained: “Fathers4Justice will start naming and shaming contact deniers this Father’s Day:

“We remind everyone that contact denial is a serious human rights violation.”

Stopping a child having any contact with one or either of their natural parents is a violation of the right to family life.

The basic human right is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Article 16, Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

This international law – which over-rules domestic rulings – states clearly:

(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

In Britain’s secret ‘family’ assizes, the state has assumed an enormous and terrifying role in randomly monitoring, ordering the behaviour of, and ultimately breaking up, ‘natural’ family units protected by the UN.

Officials – ranging from court clerks through to lawyers and judges – employ their unchecked power to jail, repeatedly fine, and, most often, threaten the families and children of anyone who speaks out about them.

Common abuses of the so-called ‘family courts’ include taking children from their fathers, and taxing the persecuted fathers afterwards for the remainder of the childs life.

If the assaulted citizen attempts to see their offspring again, the officials attack the family relationship with the use of ‘contact centres’, where children and parent are monitored, typically for two hours each fortnight.

Convicted rapists and murderers enjoy more of a right to a family life – prisoners on remand get double the family time.

It’s one of many crimes committed by the staff that campaigners want ended, and criminal prosecution for.

If you’re angry about state interference in your private family life, don’t get mad – get even.

CCN supports all forms of civil disobedience, and we neither demonise, caricature, or belittle civil rights campaigners, as do the mainstream, established press – often in violation of the Journalists Code of Conduct.

The most effective form of civil rights protest in the long term is to ally yourself to a popular campaign group and start acting boldly but slowly and methodically to force change.

A good start could be printing off this poster and putting it up in your local library.

Libraries are community facilities but sadly often carry extreme propaganda demonising men, such as false domestic violence statistics, which is issued to them by political local councils.

As taxpayers and citizens you are entitled to publicise any information that is in the public interest – typically community events, but including the download poster – on a library noticeboard.

Tweet

Bonnie Lewis from Neath in South Wales was almost killed by incompetent medics.

Doctors prescribed her her a lethal dose of morphine, and botched a series of operations, leaving the child in constant pain with septecemia and abcesses.

But when her mother Linda took her daughter out of the UK to the US for treatment – Neath Social Services kidnapped the seriously ill youngster, at gunpoint, from her hospital bed.

The youngster was smuggled out of the UK on a false passport ordered by Welsh social workers Julie Rzezniczek and Alison Paisley.

The SS staff locked the child in a psychiatric unit, and her mother was banned from going anywhere near her.

The scandal happened after Welsh SS accused Linda of ‘Munchausans Syndrome by Proxy’ – a controversial , possibly non-existent psychological disorder invented by reviled quack Roy Meadows, the man behind the Sally Clark and Angela Cannings scandals.

Munchausens Syndrome is a common excuse used by Social Services to abduct and abuse children. It allows the authorities to dismiss any claims any parent has against them, on the basis that they’re making it up, because Social Services claim they’re mentally ill.

In this extraordinary video Indy Cllr Kevin Edwards tells how he was physically threatened in a local pub by social workers, in a pattern of behaviour typical state surpression of free speech .

Cllr Edwards – whose one line retort to legal threats against him has been simply the word ‘Nuts’ – also explains how SS staff perpetrated fraud to cover up their abuse, and made malicious allegations, in a pattern of behaviour he describes as sociopathic.

Stories like this are widely claimed to have been going on for years: they never get into the supposedly free old press because social services threaten old profit-making media with costly court cases. In fact local papers, particularly in Cornwall, not only ignore such public interest stories, but side with the establishment in burying them, and smearing anyone who speaks up.

Do you know of a scandal involving the SS in Cornwall? Have your efforts to publicise your case come to nothing because no-one will listen? Let us know. Just post below.

Tweet

I noticed in the very early years of the what was then called The Woman’s Liberation Movement that once the left wing women turned upon their left wing brothers the left in England simply fell apart.

The gender war actually began in the late 1960′s.

It started when the women who had been working down in the south of the USA all met back in Washington and other places and decided that their united efforts with their brothers fighting capitalism for all those years had been wrong.

They decided it was all men who were the enemy.

The ferocity of the attacks on men blinded the early women warriers to even thinking of some of the consequences that might follow.

The war was declared at a time in England that we were going through a massive battle.

It was a struggle to establish a new kind of unified attack upon the massive strangle hold of power held by all the so called ‘caring agencies’ that had such a grip on so many peoples lives.

Those of us who were political activists were fighting to house people by squatting, to create refuges for victims of domestic violence.

To stop The DHSS from abusing people who had legitimate claims for funding.

To protect the mines from being closed down.

To fight to stop the railways from being privatised.

We clame from all walks of life and we also held all sorts of beliefs but we were unfited in the wish to create a fair and compassionate society.

Slowly as men began to be persecuted I could see the war between men and women in my country replace the real battles we were fighting and the men on the left slowly drifted away -which is why Tony Blair was able to remove Clause IV and break the back of the labour party for ever.

The gender war made it possible for the long reign of Margaret Thatcher our first Women Prime Minister.

I wrote to her when she first came to power to ask what she was going to do about domestic violence.

A minion answered to say that Margaret Thatcher was not interested in women’s issues.

Now in 2013 the damage this war has done not only to men and boys but also ourselves has to be acknowledged and something like a peace and reconciliation must hapen between the sexes.

We have to learn to live togther with our children. If we can’t there will be no such thing as society.

Tweet

Yesterday we exposed the lie put about by ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ that ‘1 in 4’ people are victims of domestic abuse.

Let’s look at a couple more big, nasty, man-hating fibs.

As we saw yesterday, under Labour, the Home Office twisted beyond recognition or plain invented a string of misandrist lies in order to falsely claim an ‘epidemic’ of ‘domestic violence’ in the UK.

The media largely swallowed it wholesale, and repeated the lies – which is what is happening in Devon and Cornwall this week as old media reproduce press releases for ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ and carry out carefully pre-selected interviews with beaten women.

Emotive and shocking, this drive to convince us ’1 in 4′ people suffer ‘domestic abuse’ is based on false statistics.

It’s cynically geared to bully us into accepting lies without question.

The examples of victims that are wheeled out for the media are never placed in a proper statistical context – that is, it’s never said how rare they are.

Like all propaganda, the drive relies heavily on upsetting pictures of individual womens injuries, and is designed to make us feel terrible for them.

Decent, honest people are badgered into blindly extending sympathy to ‘domestic violence’ campaigners, because of extreme cases of murder, or horrific mutilation.

But behind this aggressive PR, police, councils, and authority in general is ruthlessly repeating ‘factoids’ – wrong statistics – to convince us of lies.

That’s dangerous, anti-social, and harmful to communities, because it spreads the false idea that lots and lots of men are abusive.

And the ‘domestic abuse’ campaigners are at the same time laying the groundwork for rotten legislation that allows the indiscriminate, targeted arrest, and persecution, of men, on account of their gender.

The old media will not tell you that the facts they publish in news articles are reproduced unquestioned from official press releases from the police.

But they are, and we can prove it.

For example: in 2007 BBC Radio 4’s Ten O’Clock news broadcast the following bulletin:

“Domestic Violence affects 1 in 4 women. Indeed for women between 15 and 44 it’s the biggest cause of mortality.”

In the same year, Kent police wrote on their website that: “Domestic Violence is the leading cause of death for women aged between 19 and 44.”

And the Guardian wrote: “Globally, violence against women is the leading cause of death for 15 to 44 year olds.”

Now – we already know the 1 in 4 statistic is not true.

And it turns out the amazing claim – presented to you, the public, as fact, by the old media – that domestic violence kills most 15 to 44 year old women isn’t true either.

Like so many other twisted facts and wrongful vague assertions in the domestic violence business, it was simply invented by the authors of the 2005 report.

This was exposed in a little-heard Radio 4 programme about statistics that same year.

‘More or Less’ challenged the Ten O’Clock news figure – and found it was a misquote from the infamous report.

The document in fact stated domestic violence was the biggest cause of morbidity – not mortality – so ill health, rather than death – in women aged 15 to 44.

But it turns out even that was a lie.

Domestic violence is not the leading cause of death in women aged 15, or 19, to 44 – or indeed of any age – and neither is it the leading cause of ill health.

The top three global reasons for ill health in younger women are depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

And the top three global causes of death are HIV, followed by tuberculosis and then suicide. (World Health Organisation, 2007)

Domestic violence doesn’t make it into the top five.

That is – not unless you’re a feminist who’s been paid £3million to produce a report for a Fabian Government.

Today we can expose how the 2005 researchers made this statistical fiction an apparent reality.

1. They found a 1993 report by the World Bank which said ‘domestic violence and rape’ was the sixth highest cause of ill health in women across the globe aged 15 to 44.
2. They copied it into their report on the UK in 2005 – but
- Dropped all mention of ‘rape’
- Ignored the fact that it was a global, not a national statistic
And last and most strikingly of all – promoted it from sixth to first place – on a whim.

When the Home Office were challenged about this, their excuse was that the lie they had told was ‘for illustrative purposes’.

?

Nope. We don’t see that that’s any excuse for lying either.

Here’s some more: it’s astonishing how many of the statistics the old media broadcast are just made brazenly up, and how many simply impossible.

Why do we get fed this nonsense as propaganda? Cui Bono? Who Benefits?

These bogus statistics prop up an industry: a massive, inter-linked, publicly funded business that centres around two big, unaccountable, secret British bureaucracies.

These are ‘Social Services’ – know to campaigners as the ‘SS’ – and this country’s reviled ‘family’ court’ system.

Whenever there is an allegation of ‘domestic abuse’, a big expensive state machine starts up and thousands of official jobs are justified.

This approach is described innocuously as ‘multi-agency’.

What it means is that social workers, council officials, nurses, doctors, and coppers are all involved in propagating, or subjected to, the same socio-political agenda.

Normally the ‘multi-agency’ thing is too boring for the press and public, and the officials are just left to get on with it or ignored.

But when you start looking into individual cases it’s genuinely sinister.

Take the case of Melanie Garvey.

Melanie, who’s from Falmouth, unfortunately got the state involved in her family.

She was promptly unfairly accused by a doctor of having ‘learning difficulties’, after which council SS snatched her child.

The Garvey’s full story is HERE . It makes terrifying reading.

The ‘multi-agency’ approach bears on that case because the trouble all started simply because Melanie made an off-the-cuff remark to a Sure Start nursery worker.

That worker had gone to one of the council’s induction meetings about child protection and grassed Melanie up to social services.

In the end Melanie’s child was forcibly taken from her, and put up for ‘forced adoption’.

Melanie hadn’t done anything wrong. But the nurse, after her course on child protection, had been told to go to her superiors if she even suspected something was awry.

And that is exactly the message – and the danger – of ‘Domestic Abuse Week’.

The first police press release – ‘Domestic Abuse – Would You Recognise the Signs?’, sets the anti-social, paranoid tone with council official Rachel Martin saying: “We sincerely hope that this year’s campaign will give people the confidence to call for help.

“Even if they just have a niggling suspicion that something isn’t right.” .

In the style of the domestic abuse industry, the release then outlines some vague and broad criteria so we can all suspect each other.

Crimes like ‘jealous behaviour’ and ‘psychological abuse’ make the reader comfortable with suspecting pretty much anybody they know who’s not single.

Then on top of it all DCI Steve Parker proclaims confidently: “There is a link between animal cruelty and domestic abuse.”

This is a brazen attempt to get poisonous politics into the local papers and on the TV by prostituting fluffy animals for the cause.

But ask yourself – can what this policeman says – that ‘There is a link between animal cruelty and domestic abuse’ – really be true?

Really? Is there proper research? Because would it not be possible for a bully to still keep a dog in good shape?

In which case – who do we suspect – owners of well-kept dogs? Or neglected ones?

Or perhaps the answer they want to hear at the council and police HQ is ‘both’?

And that’s the whole wretched game. ‘Spread mistrust and paranoia among the public, then they’ll turn to us – the officials – for everything. We’ll have all the power, and all the lovely Government funding.’

In fact DCI Parker is repeating baseless propaganda he’s been told, contrived to make us all madly suspicious of each other.

And by the time your average idiot has cooed over a refuge pet on a TV screen or in a newspaper article, they’ve bypassed consecutive thought and convinced themselves of the terrible plague of wife-beaters out there.

So – no joke – next time your cat looks at you funny in front of a dolt – hold tight for the unannounced visit from the council lady wanting to take the baby back.

The other propaganda releases are just as bad, and some worse.

In ‘Taking back control’ we hear from Sara Williams, whose mortgage depends on the ‘Domestic Violence’ industry.

Sara is an ‘Independent Domestic Violence Advisor from a ‘Domestic Violence and Abuse Service’, her wage fully taxpayer funded.

Unsurprising then perhaps, that she wants us to report in to her not if we suspect ‘domestic violence’ – but if we suspect it might happen in the future.

She tells us: “Abusers will often try to separate the victim from friends and family.

“They may be very jealous. This can take forms such as controlling the clothes their partner wears or the people their partner is allowed to see.”

Sara then says this sort of behaviour – (presumably including your wife telling you you’re not going out with the lads and not to wear that hideous jumper) – “can be seen in the early stages of an abusive relationship”.

And not to worry if actually it turns out that the nagging, vain, moaning other half isn’t beating your mate up, phone in anyway because “even if the abuse does not escalate it can be deeply traumatic and severely affect the person.”

Next up is ‘Cyber-stalking’ – or looking at your ex’s Facebook profile.

This is a serious crime in the world of the ‘domestic abuse’ industry.

It’s also cynically put together to appeal to the old media who, while fighting a losing battle with Facebook, are forced to namecheck the network to appear ‘with it’.

An anonymous victim tells ‘KOR Communications’ – the expensive PR agency working for the cops and council – she was stalked by her ex.

She claims: “He would go to terrifying lengths to find me. He was able to add information that was untrue.”

Then we hear that her ‘ex’ left nine years ago – begging the unasked, and unanswered question: ‘Do you have any children by your ex, when did he last see them, and if we are to accept your claim and sympathise with your case, cherry-picked in total isolation from any quantifiable context; will you promise us that it was you, and not his children, who – almost a decade after you split up – he wished to ‘find’?’

Follow-up questions based in reality on a postcard please.

Today, celebrated feminists like Erin Pizzey accept and seek to tackle the social epidemic in Britain of the ‘domestic abuse’ of men and children by ‘muppet mothers’, who abuse ‘domestic violence’ laws to in turn emotionally abuse chilldren by depriving them of their right to fathers, and to a family life.

But none of that’s happened in the official world of ‘domestic abuse’ – and as you can see in this article, this week’s disinformation in the tired, dated, out of touch, lazy old media is more full of holes than a big, stinky, feminist Swiss cheese.

Perhaps if the factoids and lies only consisted of good old-fashioned 1970s man-hate, they wouldn’t be quite so dangerous.

But they don’t. The basest of the media drives this week focuses on ‘re-educating’ nurses and doctors to suspect mothers with newborns.

This affects not just men and children, but mothers.

Babies and children can’t answer back, so can be spirited away by the kind of authorities involved in the ‘domestic abuse’ drive into care homes, using the secret, unnaccountable, undemocratic ‘family’ courts.

This is because the system of protection a baby enters if the state gets involved works around an old Communist trick to bypass justice.

Soviet justice was not democratic. Instead, tribunals declared whether or not a defendant had acted ‘in the interests of the people’.

Today, in the UK, the reviled ‘family’ courts use the same scam.

They sit in secret, the lame, cowardly old media accept a ban publicising anything that goes on in them, no matter how wrong – and their guiding principle is not based on evidence, proof, or reason – but the idea that officials can be trusted to act, in secret, ‘in the interest of the child’.

Of course – like the Soviet tyrants – the officials, many of whom are stupid, gullible, or suffer from personality disorders, just make whatever decision suits them, shifting the responsibility for it onto someone too small to answer back – the ‘child’.

See tomorrow’s interview to find out what children really think of this revolting deceit, and what they have to say about these supposedly kind and caring officials when they grow up.

During ‘Domestic Abuse Week’: ‘More than 60 healthcare professionals will be involved in practical workshops to help identify and advise pregnant women and new mothers who may be experiencing domestic abuse.”

A press release claims: “ It is estimated, between four and nine women in every 100 are abused during pregnancy or just after the birth.”

Note the words: ‘ It is estimated’. By who? On what grounds? Ours not to reason why. So let’s put that statement in context.

It is estimated this article will be recommended 1,567 times and be read from start to finish by all its readers.

That estimation was based on nothing. It was a guess. Just like the estimate about ‘four and nine women in every 100’.

The release goes on: “And one midwife in five knows that at least one of her expectant mothers is a victim.”

They just can’t stop their inappropriate Colgate/Whiskas nine out of ten cats outdated slogans can they?

One midwife in five..’at least one of her expectant mothers’….what – the mothers she meets in one day? During her life? How many then?

And how does she know? Because she was told? How does she know what she was told was true? Or are feminists – as usual – imagining and assuming mens guilt?

Look back at the statistics exposed in this and our first article and take our word for it – they’re making this whole thing up on the fly.

Det Sgt Chloe Webber – still imagining ‘the abuser’ (no gender – but presumably few of the victim women have been impregnated by other women) at large, says: “Pregnancy and just after birth is a particular dangerous time.

“The victim’s attention is often taken away from her partner and directed towards the baby.

“The abuser’s control and power is challenged and as a result abuse can either begin or escalate to ensure the victim remains under the abuser’s control.”

Then we get more of the same old dafty about how “abuse can be emotional, financial” and isn’t abuse at all.

Recognising any of these quotes from the BBC or local papers? If so, it means they didn’t even do their own lame interviews with carefully pre-chosen, totally unrepresentative victims.

Just copied out the Government press release and told you it was true.

Which it’s not.

It’s a very, very nasty piece of human rights violation in preparation.

Listen to this bit: ADVA manager Rachel Martin said: “We are really pleased to be able to hold these training workshops to help educate healthcare professionals.

“The knowledge they gain can be used in hospital maternity units, health centres, GP surgeries and children’s centres .

So: Childrens Centres – your Nursery. GP surgeries – your Doctor. Your Hospital. Your local Health Centre. All basically, pretty much, spying on you.

Dozens of staff from these institutions are going to be shown propaganda plays by ‘Tender’ – (Tagline: Domestic Abuse: No Excuse!) – about how to spot if you’re being ‘abused’.

Here in Cornwall, the council’s £36k per annum ‘Domestic Violence’ expert Michelle Davies managed – while the council planned to axe bus services and half its toilets – to get funding for a full time ‘Independent Domestic Violence Advocate’ at Treliske – in the Midwifery Department.

Do none of our female readers find this terrifying? If not – they should.

Because all this doesn’t just mean another official lever for a single mother to fast-track a partner out of the house – wrong as that is alone.

It can also end in horrific official abuse of women and children: Cases like this . And this. And this .

But let’s let Rachel Martin, Manager for ADVA (Against Domestic Abuse and Violence in Devon), have the last word.

True to form, one of the official press releases for ‘abuse week’ quotes this ‘Domestic Abuse Manager’ as insisting: “With one person in four suffering domestic abuse at some time in their lives….”

Quite. Well, we may just have covered that.

Will there be any truth told this ‘Domestic Abuse Week except on CCN?

Tomorrow: DON’T SUFFER IN SILENCE – a child speaks out about official ‘domestic’ abuse

Have you seen a media outlet reproduce Government ‘domestic abuse’ propaganda without any journalistic rigour or balance?

Don’t get upset. Don’t do nothing. That will just make the problem worse. Let them know what the public feel.

Here’s how to complain.

Complain to the BBC (Radio Cornwall or Spotlight that information broadcast in Domestic Abuse week was wrong, or incitement to hatred.
Or phone them on 01752 229 201

Complain to ITV 01752 333333

Complain to Yesterdays Boring News 01752 765500

Complain to the Boring Guardian 01208 74528

Complain to the Snoringman Newspaper 01736 351146

Complain to the Deaf Briton 01872 271451

Complain to The Cornish Times 01579 342174

Complain to the The Cornish and Devon Post 01566 778220

Complain to the Atlantic FM 01872 55 34 00

Complain to the Newquay Voice 01637 878298

Complain to the St Austell Voice 01726 67722

Complain to the St Ives Times 01736 795813

Complain to the The Packet 01326 213333

Get cracking. It only takes a second and you’ll feel better afterwards.

Tweet

A massive onslaught of hate propaganda aimed at men will hit local media this week.

The local police and council have been orchestrating ‘Domestic Abuse Awareness Week’ for months.

Over the next seven days they will be sending out a volley of inaccurate claims and statistics to the local press designed to make headlines.

That means TV, radio, and the local papers will all be full of what will sound like facts and figures suggesting Cornwall is full of violent men, and beaten women.

They’re all lies. .

Even the hallowed ‘1 in 4 people are a victim of domestic abuse’ statistic is a lie, and here’s how.

The truth behind the lies of ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ .

Violence in the home is all but non-existent.

In the very rare cases it does happen, forty per-cent of the time, it is not men but women who beat up their partners at home..

Neither 1 in 4 people nor 1 in 4 women suffer what any reasonable person would ever class as ‘domestic abuse’.

The last Labour Government paid to have this statistic cooked up.

In 2005, the Home Office paid an American feminist at Royal Holloway and Bedford College £3million for ‘a review of domestic violence’.

She produced a report which broke down the word ‘domestic violence’ and gave it new definitions which were nothing to do with violence at all.

They included:

‘Watching her’
‘Telling her children things she doesn’t want them to know’
‘Criticising her appearance’
‘Sending her unwanted gifts.’
‘Ignoring her’
‘Refusing to have sex with her’
‘Denying her sexuality’

The definitions effectively covered anything and everything – and, it’s worth repeating, had nothing to do with ‘abuse’ or ‘violence’.

Armed with these dreamed up criteria, the College did a survey – not of women at large – but of women in domestic violence refuges.

This meant the research was unrepresentative to start with.

But added to that – because of the wacky criteria they’d just invented for ‘domestic abuse’ – if the researchers got a negative reply to questions about being beaten, they simply kept on, and asked if the interviewee had ever been criticised or ignored.

Incredibly, three out of four women still said ‘No’.

That means that the real ‘domestic abuse’ statistic this:

‘3 out of 4 women in womens refuges say no man every did anything unpleasant to them ever at all.’!

The false figure – that ‘1 in 4’ have suffered abuse – isn’t true at all because the word ‘abuse’ does not actually mean what it says: its meaning has been twisted and its truth stretched – beyond recognition – to mean just being ‘ignored’ or ‘watched’, or even ‘confused’.

London School of Economics Psychologist Oliver Curry explained: “When the ‘1 in 4’ domestic abuse statistic is boiled down, it means this.

“That one in four women over the course of their lives will be ignored for a period of time by their partners.”

He remarked: “It’s unfortunate if energy directed towards solving a really serious problem is dissipated on things like that.”

Founding feminist Erin Pizzey was the first woman in Britain to recognise genuine cases of violence against women.

Erin founded the first UK womens refuge: but she now campaigns for mens rights and speaks out against the ‘domestic abuse’ industry.

She says her genuine attempts to do good were hijacked by man-hating feminists, and that modern ‘domestic abuse’ industry is a dangerous racket.

She explained: “The problem is that the classification for domestic violence covers all acts.

“And the problem with that is you end up with the entire population of Britain in prison.”

She added: “False allegations of domestic violence are common, and they’re used a fast track to a divorce, in order to immediately obtain the home, and child custody.”

Here’s Canadian senator Ann Cools speaking out on the ‘nonsense’ that comes out of Womens Refuges, and how poor and inaccurate the research is.

The new UK Government promised to cut wasteful public spending like the £3million handed out to the dishonest feminist researchers by Labour in 2005.

In fact it’s done very little to stop the millions going to politically correct groups, instead asking councils to decide where to make cuts, leaving the local authorities to cut vital facilities , then moan about how terrible the cuts are.

Cornwall and Devon are still packed with publicly subsidised feminist groups whose primary job it is to repeat these old lies about ‘domestic violence’.

Take ‘AVDA’ – the special anti domestic violence unit within Devon County Council which is behind the police ‘Domestic Abuse Week’.

Look at their homepage, and you’ll see they’ve gone one step beyond carefully skewing research: they’ve just plain made up a load more definitions.

According to ‘AVDA’, if a man ‘confuses’ a woman, he is guilty of ‘psychological abuse’

And there’s a separate section for ‘financial abuse’ on the AVDA page on which they list: ‘Not paying child support’.

The second example of ‘financial abuse’ is even further removed from what sensible people might recognise as ‘abuse’ or ‘violence’.

AVDA say if a person ‘threatens to report their partner to the Benefits Agency or other authorities’ – you guessed it – that’s domestic abuse too.

It would certainly be interesting to know what the council’s benefits agency investigators think of that one.

The truth is that the facts and figures forced down your threat during ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ bear no relation to the real world at all.

If the above examples enough weren’t enough to convince you already, take AVDA’s definition of sexual abuse.

Apparently ‘making someone wear clothes that they haven’t chosen’ – constitutes the serious crime of sexual abuse.

Which would make an awful lot of style-conscious young girls sexual abusers of their friends.

And would also mean that the next time your wife tells you not to wear that awful jumper, you could phone the police and have her jailed for sexually abusing you.

It’s nonsense.

And it’s not silly, or amusing nonsense.

It’s dangerous nonsense.

Blaming the victim is something tyrants have done since time immemorial to mollify the public at large.

Today you only have to switch off your TV or put your paper down to look out at the world around you that it’s men who are the victims of feminist-driven society.

The tyrannical and secret ‘family’ courts deny a man his basic right to a family life.

And official discrimination means that businesses are bound by law to employ women – but not men.

The results can be seen in every street of every town in Britain.

Here are some real statistics for you.

- 90 per-cent of all court-assisted family separations end in a man losing both their home, and contact with their children
- 74 per-cent of court-assisted family separations feature allegations of ‘domestic abuse’
- Former ‘Family Court’ judge Robert Johnson estimates the number of those allegations that are true to be “not many”
- Under new legislation, women have to allege ‘domestic abuse’ to qualify for legal aid
- 40 per-cent of all separating fathers lose contact with their own children within two years
- 1 in 4 homes are single parent headed
- 90 per-cent of the homeless are men
- 60 per-cent of those made redundant in the last 10 years in Britain have been men
- 83 per-cent of new jobs in the last 10 years have been given to women
- In the last ten years the male suicide rate has risen by 70 per-cent
(Sources: Department of Work and Pensions, HMCourts, BBC live interview, Shelter, ONS, and SPIG)

Think on that the next time you see the untrue ‘1 in 4’ statistic repeated on TV, Radio or in the papers, along with the press suggesting you be suspicious of brutal men.

Think about the fact that three out of four women in domestic violence refuges told researchers no man had ever laid a finger on them.

And then maybe think on Burke’s famous lines:

“It is necessary only for good men to say nothing for evil to triumph.”

We believe the evil of ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ is in its instigation.

Among other things, over the next week we hope to show that its authors are officials who abuse or endorse the abuse of families and children.

They’re engaged in the age-old tyrants tactic of blaming a scapegoat for their own crimes.

So ‘Don’t Suffer in Silence’ – as these cynical ‘domestic abuse’ twits put it.

Speak out when you see a media outlet reproduce Government ‘domestic abuse’ propaganda without any journalistic rigour or balance.

Here’s how to complain.

Complain to the BBC (Radio Cornwall or Spotlight that information broadcast in Domestic Abuse week was wrong, or incitement to hatred.
Or phone them on 01752 229 201

Complain to ITV 01752 333333

Complain to Yesterdays Boring News 01752 765500

Complain to the Boring Guardian 01208 74528

Complain to the Snoringman Newspaper 01736 351146

Complain to the Deaf Briton 01872 271451

Complain to The Cornish Times 01579 342174

Complain to the The Cornish and Devon Post 01566 778220

Complain to the Atlantic FM 01872 55 34 00

Complain to the Newquay Voice 01637 878298

Complain to the St Austell Voice 01726 67722

Complain to the St Ives Times 01736 795813

Complain to the The Packet 01326 213333

Get cracking. It only takes a second and you’ll feel better afterwards.

Tomorrow: Lies, Damn Lies and More Statistics

Note to loyal readers: you facebooked this article 114 times – well done and thanks for contributing to the campaign! It only shows no fbks or tweets below because that’s what happens when you change the category sometimes!

Tweet

by Erin Pizzey

I thank all of you who sent best wishes for my 74th birthday.

It has been a hard year but very slowly I can see more and more people are beginning to realise that domestic violence is not and never has been a gender issue.

Also the gender war against men and boys has resulted in the collapse of family life and and created a hostile environment for relationships between the sexes.

Western governments played their part in refusing to see quite clearly that the state has usurped the role of fathers.

Men as fathers are being forcibly made redundant.

The new family is now ‘woman and their children.’

It is up to all of us to join together to expose the lies that have been told that has caused such a rift.

Because at the end of the day the simple truth is that all of need and want is to be loved and to be loved in return.

Children need ant want their fathers just as much they want and need their mothers.

Sadly we still live in a bully culture.

On my 74th birthday I promise you that I want to continue to fight for the right for all of us to love each other.

And let’s kick the government and the judiciary out of our lives!

Tweet

The battle to deal with fascist neo-feminism through raising awareness and positive media can be won – and every time you see media coverage that resists the status quo, every time you tell someone about it, online or in real-time, it does make a difference. See for yourselves with this extraordinary graph that a civil rights activist posted to Erin’s timeline on her birthday; it charts an explosion in pro-feminist propaganda throughout Erin’s political life, but a fairly recent, and substantial, decline in the popularity of the doctrine, with a corresponding rise in interest in father and motherhood. It’s nowhere near equal yet, and we all know society at large is still overwhelmingly neo-feminist and misandrist, and will be until the abolition of the secret courts that enforce the doctrine and translate it into overt political oppression – but it’s a start. No-one’s ever going to go out and smash things in the name of freedom and equality unless they think the world will take notice, and raising awareness is the first step – so well done everyone!

Elizabeth Butler Sloss, who presided over the despised ‘family courts’, told the House of Lords that protestors against her secret court system threatened to kidnap her dog.

The group she’s accused – Fathers for Justice – rubbish the claim, and could sue Sloss in a proper court.

F4J founder Matt O’Connor said: “We know full well this is an utterly and disgraceful attempt to assassinate the character of Fathers4Justice.

“In ten years, we have had many false allegations made against us by the establishment we seek to protest against.”

He added: “If someone makes an allegation like this, they should be able to provide the evidence to support it.”

Sloss’s mad rant is a faint echo of an equally unpleasant smear that once forced the massively popular civil rights movement to temporarily disband.

F4J briefly split up in 2006 after an almost carbon-copy lie by disgraced Sun editor Rebekah Wade.

Wade’s red-top rag splashed the news that the group had hatched a ‘plot to kidnap’ PM’s baby son Leo Blair on her front page.

Like much news in the mainstream media, the story was entirely fabricated, at the behest of the Government of the day.

What had in fact happened was that Tony Blairs universally loathed radical feminist lawyer wife Cherie leaked a made-up story to Wade – one that she in turn had been fed by the police.

Special Branch told Blair of a tape they’d made of a casual conversation between two civil rights supporters, and suggested – falsely – there was a threat to kidnap her baby.

In fact the conversation they’d recorded took place in a pub opposite the Old Bailey and consisted of nothing more than post-protest bandinage between two non-ranking newbie F4J supporters over a drink.

The recording contains nothing more than the reflections of the two men at the bar of London’s Viaduct Inn.

The two marchers say that perhaps if the Blairs had their child taken – in the same way that the family courts had taken theirs – they would give their complaints of injustice more credence.

Red-faced cops – still smarting from security breaches by the campaign group – leaped on the tape and played it up to the Blairs.

Sloss, who was division president at the time, has made a fortune out of removing children from their parents homes and interfering in innocent people’s personal lives.

She still lives in a luxurious country home just outside Exeter in Devon – the target of many peaceful though highly charged rallies and protests.

Sloss is such a bad wife herself her husband resorts to using prostitutes

And she was one of the most bigoted family division presidents ever, even by the standards of her own corrupt courts.

The family courts are not courts at all, but private assizes in which judges make any decision they like, with no regard to the evidence, or public opinion.

Despite years of campaigning, the courts still have no juries, no press access, and no burden of proof.

Staff, from judges to lawyers and clerks, are accused by civil rights groups of widespread and often horrific abuses of children and parents.

People who tell the press about proceedings or complain in any way are routinely jailed, in a flouting of basic democratic freedoms it is the job of a free press to expose.

But shockingly, your failing local papers in Cornwall, finally ditched by the Daily Mail in October and sold to dodgy cost-cutter David Montgomery, actually support the undemocratic courts – and have themselves smeared the equal rights protestors with proven “unbalanced” coverage.

Earlier this year the press complaints commission found senior West Briton Reporter Kimberley Middleton ‘misled’ readers with biased reporting about a local group of Fathers for Justice protestors.

The PC, ass-kissing West Briton, Cornishman, Cornish Guardian and Western Morning News have been losing readers in droves since the dawn of the internet and a new era in media

Tweet

I have taken some time to reflect on the protest against Dr Warren Farrell last November at the University of Toronto, and have watched the video of that sad event.

I have not seen such an ugly demonstration by feminists since the seventies.

I have known Warren Farrell for a long time and I have nothing but respect for him. It was saddening to see such hate filled faces on the screen and to hear women calling men ‘fucking scum.”

One man who came to ask for help in understanding why two of his male friends committed suicide he was abused and sworn at by a Rottweiler of a woman.

Another was told he should be ‘fucking ashamed” of himself, for even being there. The atmosphere was hostile and threatening to the police. I have not heard them called ‘pigs’ since the 1960s.

Though I am horrified at their actions, part of me is celebrating because finally here is the true, ugly face of the women’s movement, stripped of its phony, egalitarian mask, and placed on permanent display for the world to see.

For too many years the truth has been hidden behind intellectual arguments and bureaucratic edifices while the virulent ideologues produced by feminism have burrowed their way into positions of power and influence.

As epitomized in this protest video, and the university administration’s non response to the violence, infiltration into academe is one of their greatest successes.

Here, the Senior Women Tutors at the University of Toronto conspired with their students to create an antidemocratic riot in the heart of their university.

To most people watching the demonstration the women and their sad male hangers-on looked violent and dysfunctional; so much so that they may have been taken as outliers, exceptions to the feminist rule.

But these are the same kinds of women I have encountered many times before; women who are at once determined to brand all men as “violent” and “oppressive,” but who routinely use violence and intimidation themselves as a means to enforce their will on others.

I am hopeful that the majority of young women who watched the programme will have been warned off the whole concept of a woman’s movement as it practiced today.

From the very beginning in the very early “collectives,” which is what they called their conferences, the atmosphere was always hostile to anyone who even dared question the Marxist tenants of the women who were preaching to the rest of us.

This was the first “hate movement” I personally encountered.

I knew of fringe groups that espoused hatred against Black people, against Jews and against other forms of religion, but this time here was a movement that vowed to destroy all men and remove them from their families, and it was getting public acceptance.

This is why they so many wanted to silence Warren Farrell.

His message is that time is running out for men, and if we are all not willing to do something about this oppressive movement then the family as we know it, along with our society, will all but disappear.

As I travel around different countries looking at the damage that has been wreaked upon the fabric of their societies I am afraid for my grandsons and great grandsons.

In Slovenia I was introduced to a very powerful woman who had a staff of 39 women, she told me proudly.

She also employed one man. He was the receptionist.

Most of the women in power that I was able to talk to complained that it was hard for them to meet professional men because most of them had been pushed aside in order to fulfill quotas for women in employment.

I realized that a lot of the men were now marginalized and that many of them were very unhappy.

Women-only quotas are already in existence and it will not be long before the workplace, at least the non-lethal workplace, becomes a women-only space, much like is already happening in our institutions of higher education.

I am glad that there is now a reminder of the true face of feminism that can be seen by all the people who watch the University of Toronto demonstration on video.

It is there that they can finally see what lies underneath the disingenuous façade of egalitarian feminist rhetoric — jackboot thugs and robotic, hate-filled minds.

You can no longer afford to ignore them.

Tweet

The ‘protest’ organised by left wing lecturers at Toronto has been roundly trashed, despite online efforts by the ‘protestors’. If this article about equalities by Erin impressed you, we suggest you join Tomorrow, a democratic political movement launching this year and aimed at rejecting the conformist political parties. Tomorrows primary aim is to finally outlaw Britain’s fascist secret courts, which violate human rights and cause the death of children and parents across Britain.

CCN fully endorses this civil rights struggle in our editorial line and we see it as our responsibility as journalists to expose censored cases, and openly ignore and expose unjust laws. We actively work to stop the prejudiced and bigoted reporting of civil rights issues in the local press, and invite readers to do the same. Misandry – the promotion of sexism against and hatred of men – is widespread in old media, and if you see or read any it is now very easy to make your voice heard. See the links below. And remember, if you don’t act, nothing will change, and the secret ‘family law’ system will be left to kill you or one of your family or friends

Complain to the BBC (Radio Cornwall or Spotlight that information they broadcast in Domestic Abuse week was wrong, or incitement to hatred.
Or phone them on 01752 229 201

Complain to ITV 01752 333333

Complain to Yesterdays Boring News 01752 765500

Complain to the Boring Guardian 01208 74528

Complain to the Snoringman Newspaper 01736 351146

Complain to the Deaf Briton 01872 271451

Complain to The Cornish Times 01579 342174

Complain to the The Cornish and Devon Post 01566 778220

Complain to the Atlantic FM 01872 55 34 00

Complain to the Newquay Voice 01637 878298

Complain to the St Austell Voice 01726 67722

Complain to the St Ives Times 01736 795813

Complain to the The Packet 01326 213333

I called losing your children a ‘living bereavement’ back in 2002.

At that point I had nearly taken my own life.

I would never have dreamt of killing my kids, instead I wanted to take my own life to escape the unspeakable pain I was feeling.

Ultimately, instead of taking something, I gave something.

Geldof dubbed losing your kids as akin to a ‘holocaust of the heart’.

Fathers are desperate because these are desperate times and when you have lost everything, people lose it.

Some drink, some do drugs, some throw themselves in front of trains, most go unreported, frankly because no one – and I mean NO ONE – gives a shit.

There is NO safety net.

There is NO care.

I know, I have been there.

I understand the causes that drive desperate people to do desperate things that none of us in our right minds can begin to understand or explain.

But why is it when a woman kills her children – which is 50% of cases – there is always an excuse and lashings of sympathy?

And that when a father does it – he is simply hated?

Our different responses illustrate rampant prejudices in society.

The prejudices that mean a father will lose everything after separation, his children, his home and his life.

He knows he has lost everything.

I know people still being hunted down by the CSA a decade later – people whose lives have been utterly destroyed by secret family courts and a system that is inhumane and barbaric at every turn.

No one should judge any man or father for we do not know their state of mind.

For me, the only person who can judge is God.

For us, we often ask what we could do to prevent these appalling acts, two of which have happened on the doorstep of our family.

Given the desperate state of affairs, we have to focus on the cause of the problems, not the symptoms.

More than anything, we want to create a climate of hope for dads, to create a society in which they know they will not lose their children or families.

When I started F4J I was already seeing my children.

I didn’t do this for me, I did it for them.

I was lucky, but the more people that adopt this approach, the quicker we can change the law.

Matt O’Connor, Founder, Fathers4Justice

If you want to help children afflicted by state-sponsored child abuse, clicking HERE is a good start: if you want to take action locally, click HERE

Tweet

Senior liberals from all political wings, popular newspapers, and equalities activists are clamouring for the scalp of ‘floating mandarin’ David Norgrove.

63 year old Norgrove, a businessman whose last job was ‘managing’ the country’s pensions under Labour, has an unofficial, random Whitehall role chairing enquiries.

Critics believed he is just drafted in whenever a whitewash is called for.

Norgrove was in Cornwall last month, visiting Delabole as he prepared to review the national minimum wage – a ‘review’ yet to be published .

Last week the Peckham-born businessman sparked an outcry when his long-awaited ‘Family Justice Review’ came out.

The document – which failed to recommend any reforms and supported a status quo that has led to a decade of civil disobedience – has been roundly rubbished.

Married millionaire father of one Norgrove was told to consult with equalities campaigners and family groups, who have pushed for forty years for a ’50/50′ shared parenting law.

Instead, he drafted in a panel of social workers and others with a vested interest in prolonging the existing system.

Thanks to Norgrove, children of seperations will now not only not be able to see their fathers after separation.

Without protracted court cases, kids will not get to see their grandparents either.

Norgrove branded grandparents trying to get to see their grandchildren as guilty of ‘interference’.

Since his astonishing decision, online trends are showing previously law-abiding family campaigners actively radicalising.

Many are adding the Guy Fawkes mask logo to their web pages and expressing support for the ‘Occupy’ movement.

In the official British mass media, Norgrove’s most strident critics were leading female social commentators, who branded him a ‘sexist’ ‘child-hater’.

In the Daily Mail, senior Conservative Amanda Platell descibed the Norgrove report as outdated, sexist nonsense .

Catholic commentator Christina Odone wrote in the Telegraph that the elderly ex-pensions fund manager would now be remembered as the ‘man who hated children’.

And Lib Dem blogger Jo Philips, the former press secretary to Paddy Ashdown, dissed Norgrove for “undermining fathers’ rights to be fathers and dismissing grandparents as a nuisance.”

In the Express, MP Anne Widdecombe, a long-time supporter of shared parenting, was given a full page to roundly rubbish the report .

And columnist Camilla Tominey went as far as to say that faced with Norgove’s new laws, she too would join civil rights group Fathers for Justice

Meanwhile the international press quickly used Norgrove to represent Britain’s decline, running editorial entitled ‘Britain’s family law betrays families’

Finally on national BBC Radio, Norgrove saw his argument that banning chidren from seeing their fathers or grandparents was ‘in their interest’ ripped to shreds.

Fathers for Justice founder Matt O’Connor challenged the sacked Marks and Spencers director on his “bizarre” conclusions.

Matt posted to Facebook supporters after his broadcast debate with Norgrove: “I asked him what empirical evidence his panel relied on.

“So this report cannot be stood up. By anyone’s standards, it’s an amateurish and incompetent piece of work.”

The veteran campaigner added: “The ‘child’s bests interests’ claim is a wicked deceit, a smokescreen used by vested interests to claim they are acting for children.

“All the while they are profiteering from the suffering of those very same children and families.”

Caught in a backlash, the man described online as a ‘deformed fraggle’ desperately claimed his findings had the support of the highly respected Centre for Social Justice.

But that turned out to be nonsense.

The CSJ think tank were in fact furious at him for a report they said: “failed to address the bias in the family law system against fathers and grandparents”.

The influential policy unit ran a banner spoiler on its website and stated emphatically: “David Norgrove’s report will fuel the epidemic of fatherlessness in the UK.

“Urgent changes are required in this legislation to reflect the vital role non-resident parents play, usually fathers, for their child’s wellbeing.

Most striking of all though has been the social media response to Norgrove’s report.

Dad Matt Howland wrote: “Occupy The Family Court Worldwide! What are they going to do – incarcerate us all?

“In the time of the Arab Spring and world upheaval, maybe now is the time to take this to the next level?”

Unison Branch Steward Peter Barford posted: “Occupy the Family Courts..after all, they’re supposed to be ‘for the people’.

Others posted news of just how backward the UK was on equal gender and children’s rights.

John Mills remarked: “I count myself lucky I had children with a Swede here in Sweden.

“I feel for all fathers in back in the UK stuck with that outdated system..stopping kids seeing grandparents and fathers because it’s ‘in.their interest’.. rubbish!

“All kids deserve a family.”

Another Facebooker Dave Dale left the following much-loved pub joke routine as a comment on the rubbished review.

“David Norgrove is touring the countryside in a chauffeur-driven car.
Suddenly, a pig jumps out into the road, they hit it full on and the car comes to a stop.
David, in his usual charming manner, says to the chauffeur:
‘You get out and check – you were driving.. ‘
The chauffeur gets out, checks and reports that the animal is dead.
‘You were driving; go and tell the farmer, ‘ says David.
Five hours later, the chauffeur returns totally plastered, hair ruffled with a big grin on his face.
‘My god, what happened to you? ‘asks David.
The chauffeur replies: ‘ When I got there, the farmer opened his best bottle of malt whisky, the wife gave me a slap-up meal and the daughter made love to me. ‘
‘What on earth did you say? ‘asks David.
‘ I knocked on the door, and when it was answered, I said to them: ‘ I’m David Norgrove’s chauffeur and I’ve just killed the pig.

Did you know?

Then after you’ve had your say, just click ‘Unlike’ on the left- lest anyone be deluded into believing the Government’s popularity is growing.

Tweet