Socialize

SO WHO RUNS MAINSTREAM MEDIA?

Three failing mainstream newspapers refused to run an advert from civil rights pressure group Fathers for Justice.

The ad – which you can see here on uncensored CCN, access online, or download and distribute yourself – carried a Valentine’s Day message from political prisoner Tim Haries to his daughters Katie and Scarlett.

You can read Tim’s story HERE and HERE.

The refusal came despite the fact that the papers concerned had already covered Tim’s trial and previous court hearings in detail.

F4J Campaign Director Nadine O’Connor explained: “We offered several design options to the newspapers this week through our media agency.

“But late on Thursday evening the final ad was rejected by The Independent BEFORE they had even seen the advert.

“This was after the Times had ACCEPTED the ad and then rejected it hours later.”

“We are obviously disappointed that our adverts were rejected and that all the newspapers had coincidentally adopted the same position.

“There was no legal reason why our final adjusted ad could not have been run. No doubt people will draw their own conclusions as to why this has happened.”

Here’s the weasel words of all three papers, with click-thru-links so you can send them emails protesting or asking for further explanation. Need only be a line. It all counts.

REFUSED BY THE TELEGRAPH
The Telegraph told our media agency, “To protect the girls they want their faces pixilated, and also their names removing. Also they want Tim’s surname to be removed.”

Contact the Telegraph with your view HERE

REFUSED BY THE TIMES
Date: 13 February 2014 17:45:35 GMT
Subject: Father 4 Justice Ad

Good evening,

First of all please apologise for the late withdrawal of the ad to the buying agency. While editorial had no editorial reason why this should not run the Times legal team have refused it based on the below points…
# News UK do not know the back-story to this case as to whether what is being claimed is true.
# Privacy issues in-relation to naming and using photos of hid daughters
# Breach of reporting restrictions which apply in the family courts

The next steps would be to either provide the above to gain access or for the creative to submit through the ASA for approval.

Any questions let me know.

CT

Email the Times HERE

REFUSED BY THE INDENDENT
The Independent newspaper claim advert ‘could cause’ emotional harm to his children.

Sent: 12 February 2014 10:58
Subject: RE: Fathers4Justice Ad

Mate
Seemingly he can’t use his image or the kids (we assume he doesn’t have his ex’s approval)
So we could run the letter, but he’d have to drop their names, and he’d have to drop the political bit.
Eventually it was shown to Amol the actual editor, and his issue is that its ‘could cause’ emotional harm to the kids.
The rationale being that either the kids or one of their friends could easily see the picture of their dad in the paper, which may create questions, and then the emotional harm.
Let me know
Cheers
J

Tell the Dependent what you think HERE



Posted by on February 21, 2014. Filed under CCN FIGHTS FASCISM,CIVIL RIGHTS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

One Response to SO WHO RUNS MAINSTREAM MEDIA?

  1. T Harold Graham

    February 24, 2014 at 9:34 pm

    Well done for flagging this Cornwall Community News. Yourselves and social media represent the cutting edge of real news as more and more reject the London press as well as the centrally owned and managed Cornishman, West Briton etc which deserve to be disregarded. Men are being demonized. This never makes the carefully managed media. Keep exposing the truth and well done!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>